@article {119, title = {National Survey of Medication Safety Practice: Environmental Culture and Staff Competency at Primary Healthcare Centers/ Community Pharmacies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia}, journal = {Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biomedical Reports}, volume = {5}, year = {2019}, month = {January 2019}, pages = {20-27}, type = {Research Article}, chapter = {20}, abstract = {

Objective: To explore the national survey of medication safety practices with an emphasis on environmental factors and staff competencies at primary healthcare centers (PHCs) and community pharmacies (CPs) in Saudi Arabia, Riyadh city. Method: This is a 4-month cross-sectional medication safety practice survey conducted at pharmacies of PHCs of Ministry of Health and CPs in Riyadh city. The survey consisted of the modified version of the Medication Safety Self-Assessment{\textregistered} for Community/ Ambulatory Pharmacy from the Institute of Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). The survey consisted of a demographic section and 10 domains with questions on environmental factors, staff competency and education. The authors distributed the questionnaire and followed-up on a daily basis by physically visiting or via telephonic call. The survey was prepared in an electronic format and it was analyzed through the Survey Monkey system and Microsoft Excel version 10. Result: The survey was distributed to 13 PHCs and 23 CPs. The average score of all the ISMP-self assessment of medication safety items at PHCs was 2.75 {\textpm} 0.36 (54.94\%) (95\% confidence interval (95\% CI) = 2.55{\textendash}2.95; P\<0.05; range = 2.04{\textendash}3.38). The average score of all ISMP-self assessment of medication safety items at CPs was 3.14 {\textpm} 0.42 (62.86\%) (95\% CI = 2.90{\textendash}4.38; P\<0.05; range = 2.40{\textendash}3.88). The average score of environmental factors, workflow and staffing domain at PHCs was 2.7 {\textpm} 0.45 (54\%) (95\% CI = 2.53{\textendash}2.87; P\<0.05; range = 1.55{\textendash}3.68), whereas in CPs, the average score was 3.58 {\textpm} 0.43 (71.6\%) (95\% CI = 3.44{\textendash}3.717; P\<0.05; range = 2.63{\textendash}4.37). The average score of staff competency and education at PHCs was 3.02 {\textpm} 0.298 (60.4\%) (95\% CI = 2.9{\textendash}3.2; P\<0.05; range = 2.64{\textendash}3.55), whereas in the CPs, the average score was 4.15 {\textpm} 0.20 (83\%) (95\% CI = 4.03{\textendash}4.27; P\<0.05; range = 3.78{\textendash}4.53). Conclusion: The PHCs implemented only half of the environmental factors, workflow and staff competency domains preventive measures for medication safety and lower than CPs. Targeting of improving environmental culture and staff competency for medication safety at PHCs is highly recommended in KSA.

}, keywords = {Community Pharmacy, Environmental culture, Medication, Primary Healthcare Centers, Riyadh, Safety, Saudi Arabia, Staff competency}, doi = {10.5530/PTB.2019.5.5}, author = {Yousef Ahmed Alomi and Zainab Abdulmunem Almuallem and Manar Mohammed Alslim and Rana Mohammed Alslim and Khulud Abdulrahman Alamoudi and Adel Mehmas Hamdi Alragas} } @article {120, title = {National Survey of Medication Safety Practice: Medication Administration at Primary Healthcare Centers/Community Pharmacies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia}, journal = {Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biomedical Reports}, volume = {5}, year = {2019}, month = {January 2019}, pages = {28-35}, type = {Research Article}, chapter = {28}, abstract = {

Objective: To explore the national medication safety practice with emphasis on medication administration at primary healthcare centers (PHCs) and community pharmacies (CPs) in Riyadh city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a four-month cross-sectional medication safety practice survey conducted at PHC pharmacies and CPs in Riyadh city. The survey consisted of the modified version of the Medication Safety Self-Assessment{\textregistered} for Community/Ambulatory Pharmacy from the Institute of Safe Medication Practice (ISMP). The survey consisted of a demographic section and 10 domains with 198 questions. The domains included questions on patient information; drug information; communication of drug orders and other drug information; drug labeling and packaging and nomenclature; use of devices; environmental factors; staff competency and education; patient education; quality processes; and risk management domain. In this study, we emphasized on medication administration; it is a finding from medication safety self-assessment for community/ambulatory pharmacy in Riyadh city. Results: The survey was distributed to 13 PHC pharmacies and 23 CPs. The average score of all ISMP-self assessment items of medication safety at PHCs was 2.75{\textpm}0.36 (54.94\%) (95\% CI=2.55{\textendash} 2.95; P\<0.05; range=2.04{\textendash}3.38). The average score of all ISMP-self assessment items of medication safety at CPs was 3.14{\textpm}0.42 (62.86\%) (95\% CI=2.90{\textendash}4.38; P\<0.05; range=2.40{\textendash}3.88). The average score of drug standardization, storage and distribution domain at PHCs was 2.35{\textpm}0.41 (47\%) (95\% CI=2.17{\textendash}2.53; P\<0.05; range=1.33{\textendash}3.09) and in CPs, it was 3.4{\textpm}0.54 (68\%) (95\% CI =3.16{\textendash}3.54; P\<0.05; range=2.22{\textendash}4.25). The average score of medication devices acquisition, use and monitoring domain at PHCs was 3.62{\textpm}0.14 (72.4\%) (95\% CI=3.26{\textendash}3.978; P\<0.05; range=3.45{\textendash}3.70) and in CPs, it was 2.78{\textpm}0.23 (55.6\%) (95\% CI=2.21{\textendash}3.349; P\<0.05; range=2.63-3.05). Conclusion: The medication administration safety was inadequate at PHCs while acceptable at CPs. Targeting to drug standardization, storage and distribution with emphasis on medication devices use and monitoring are highly recommended at PHCs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

}, keywords = {Administration, Community Pharmacy, Medication, Primary care centers, Riyadh, Safety, Saudi Arabia}, doi = {10.5530/PTB.2019.5.6}, author = {Yousef Ahmed Alomi and Adel Mehmas Hamdi Alragas and Manar Mohammed Alslim and Khulud Abdulrahman Alamoudi and Zainab Abdulmunem Almuallem and Rana Mohammed Alslim} }